Rramirez, all professional courtesies to the fellow lawyers aside, I'm chomping at the bit for Susman and Co. to start laying things on the line here. Surely if folks on these discussion boards do their DD and interpret what's really transpired here, I would think that the EC knows this even more so. Any thoughts as to why what we consider as obvious points haven't been laid out yet?
I don't recall who made the statement (I believe the Noteholder's attorney??) yesterday that all of that money ... $4B SJ and the tax returns could all be lost if that GS agreement expired as JPM had a claim against all of it!!
If I understood the Quinn lawyer correctly in his Examiner scope argument, he ironically stated that he could withdraw the $4B WMI deposit on his ATM card!! Is that what others heard?
Seems they have different views on how secure the $4B is and what ruling the Judge would have made!! Or just got carried away with their drama!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
