InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

steel58

07/07/10 10:47 AM

#218103 RE: uzualsuzpect #218095

UZ -- Have any of these depositions been objected to by Susman? If not, why is he letting them have depositions regardless of subject when they keep stonewalling over any kind of information Susman is looking for?
icon url

eet2

07/07/10 11:33 AM

#218119 RE: uzualsuzpect #218095

EC needs to depose B.Rosen, J.Dimon, and S.Bair.
icon url

trailblazin

07/07/10 12:55 PM

#218146 RE: uzualsuzpect #218095

seems to me like these EC depos could really backfire for BR. I mean.....after all this wasted time, BR is seemingly trying to somehow discredit the members of the EC, which has absolutely NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the facts of this case. What assets were transferred? What value do they have? etc etc. Logically, it seems to me that these type of shenanigans would irritate the judge. But then again....why should logic suddenly apply in this case?
icon url

GO4AWILDRIDE

07/07/10 1:26 PM

#218159 RE: uzualsuzpect #218095

Uzual

Wonder why SUSMAN has not put in motions to depose the members of the BOD and ROSENTURD for all the crap they have pulled?

Give ROSENCRAP a tit for tat sort of the BS they are playing!


GO WAMMMMUUUUUU

GO SUSMAN

GO EC

GO JUDGE MARY