UZ -- Have any of these depositions been objected to by Susman? If not, why is he letting them have depositions regardless of subject when they keep stonewalling over any kind of information Susman is looking for?
seems to me like these EC depos could really backfire for BR. I mean.....after all this wasted time, BR is seemingly trying to somehow discredit the members of the EC, which has absolutely NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the facts of this case. What assets were transferred? What value do they have? etc etc. Logically, it seems to me that these type of shenanigans would irritate the judge. But then again....why should logic suddenly apply in this case?