InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lawrence 147

06/21/10 4:04 PM

#214432 RE: barefoot123 #214421

There is nothing Rosen can claim and especially that he did not know something. Most all of his filings from the very first one, show Rosen did know what existed and was going after it. Fraudulent Conveyance comes to mind and yet that is precisely what he is attempting to do with all of his past POS POR’s. Rosen knows the absolute rule of priority and yet he persist in his attempt to change it. This whole thing is about to blow up in his face and he knows it.
Once again, Susman did not give up the examiner, all he did was agree to give Rosen one last chance to solidify the need for an examiner. Now Rosen has said it will take until the 30th to populate the data base with the records, I call BS on that one and I am sure the judge will as well certainly after Rosen or his flunkey made comments as to what documents would be provided. Clearly this shows they do not intend to do as the judge told them to do. They will comply or there will be an examiner possibly before the 8th if the next POR is not in compliance on the first or Susman request it based on the documents refused.
icon url

wamuvoodoo

06/21/10 4:29 PM

#214438 RE: barefoot123 #214421

barefoot exactly i already stated something about this ,he always spoke that we are out of the money and the p's will get something,but according to this last court he sang a different tune in reference to someone getting something (aka bearing fruit)and other hints threwout the court day ,so he allready spoke about the p's in previous courts getting coin si now i assume he was talking about us..things are looking very good