InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

xoom

06/16/10 3:05 PM

#212137 RE: rramirez82 #212135

RRamirez....
We all are waiting eagerly for you to send that letter...

TIA
icon url

Gmenfan

06/16/10 3:06 PM

#212139 RE: rramirez82 #212135

Nice post. When the time comes, please share your letter with the board if you can.
icon url

SlyOne

06/16/10 3:09 PM

#212143 RE: rramirez82 #212135

Its not only Rosen, Its also AM.
They are working together on this fraud.

;-(
icon url

HROLLER

06/16/10 3:34 PM

#212164 RE: rramirez82 #212135

Thank you!
icon url

nixonfoust

06/16/10 3:36 PM

#212166 RE: rramirez82 #212135

The $64000 question then becomes... How is Rosen able to be so blatant about it w/o so much as a sideways glance from the judge for this long? The implied conflict of interest should be enough for he and his firm to be removed from the case. Something must be in place that we are not priviledged to know about that lets him get away with it.
icon url

jhdf51

06/16/10 4:08 PM

#212182 RE: rramirez82 #212135

Great rramirez...than you on behalf of my family. One thing we can all agree on...the amount of fraudulent and criminal intent here is beyond comprehension. I would love to see swift justice now and an examiner appt tomorrow.

It would go a long ways in reinstilling my belief in our court system.


JHD
icon url

intuitive3

06/16/10 4:16 PM

#212187 RE: rramirez82 #212135

Thank you Ramirez! I strongly agree with your sentiments and respect your future actions.