Question..If Lucent is as I believe a 3G trigger for Nokia..How does Nokia's action today void, or even delay the AUTHORITY of the ICC BINDING Arbitration for an immediate determination of Nokia's 3G rate? TIA
I will note that Nokia does know that Lucent and IDCC are in mediation this month. And, if Lucent is a trigger for Nokia and 3G, then they might be preempting another Ericcson situation.
Yes, and NOK already signed a 3G license with IDCC. How can they now claim "patent invalidity and noninfringement and violations of the Lanham Act relating to 3G mobile phone technology".