InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

arthritis65

01/13/05 1:54 PM

#90401 RE: mschere #90400

mschere could you list again all the companies that say we own enough 3g for them to have paid and will pay..
icon url

arthritis65

01/13/05 1:54 PM

#90402 RE: mschere #90400

mschere could you list again all the companies that say we own enough 3g for them to have paid and will pay..
icon url

jjff

01/13/05 1:54 PM

#90403 RE: mschere #90400

Will this cause our paying 3g customers to halt future payouts
till this is settled? ANYBODY!
icon url

sjratty

01/13/05 1:58 PM

#90407 RE: mschere #90400

I think it has no bearing. One perspective could be that things are anticipated to go poorly, so they are using 3G to balance that. Another perspective is that things are going very well, and they now realize that maybe they can get out of owing IDCC money for anything (or at least significantly minimize it). The bottom line - it has no relevance. What it does mean is that we now have to engage in the same battle over 3G that we did over 2G...leading to, in my opinion, delays in signing more 3G contracts.
icon url

spider69

01/13/05 2:46 PM

#90448 RE: mschere #90400

mschere...I like the optimism but do we know FOR SURE that the 3 arbitration panelists are underway? Its easy to take that for granted....I assume they are and that is why NOK fired this shot but we REALLY don't know that for certain, do we?