InvestorsHub Logo

Basser1

06/01/10 6:59 PM

#71927 RE: owgur #71924

Ok if you want to leave Jerry's post completely out of the equation that still leaves many other visitors to the CEO that were fed information on an individual basis. If one investor knows something ahead of the rest of the investors this is what leads to insider trading. It is not that hard of a concept to grasp is it?

He said not specifically tied to the dividend but that the TA was gagged mainly because of some type of internal accounting issue.... like there were 10 to 20 million shares floating around that weren't accounted for.


she said that in a dividend spin-off all shares in the public company have to be accounted for and all shareholder's of record accounted for before the dividend can be paid out.

Maybe...... That's why ETC didn't happen......... OHHHHHHHHHhhhhhh "we didn't know"..... BULL




Somehow this caused you to jump right to the NSS position and say that it was was the reason that etc never happpened. How many FTD's came out of this? Answer: NONE! No NSS position without FTD's.

Quote from Venom's post:
I told her that the product that was being spun off was already making money and she said that depending on what date the company sets for revenue recognition for the sales..all or a part of revenue made by that product could go to the new company..Once the private company is on record all of the revenue must go to that company..

Now this is what was a complete crock since etc never made any money or at least none that any of the investors ever saw in print because the company doesn't believe in posting their financials.
JMHO
Basser

99leadballoons

06/01/10 7:49 PM

#71934 RE: owgur #71924

BALONEY.

The "broker" veno called doesnt know what they are talking about. Call a TA. Call FINRA.

A TA accounts for the shares every day. IT IS THEIR JOB.

If what the proponents of the ridiculous NSS position say is true, what is the point of ever calling the TA and getting the share structure?

The divvy didnt happen because they realized it wasn't going to allow them to raise any cash. Shares in a private company are not worth much without a buyout. They have no liquidity.

Expo needs to be able to sell shares at a discount and have them be able to be dumped on the market almost immediately to lure in people. And by people we do mean TWO PEOPLE.

Wonder who the TWO PEOPLE are or who they are directly connected to?

Lurker from Mars

06/02/10 10:17 AM

#71960 RE: owgur #71924

I'm really surprised that when those pallets of products went by the camera today that someone didn't say they were the same stuff over and over and they where just re-assembling it off camera and running it by the camera to make it look like they had product.


that does remind me of the day there was a lot of hype here over all those pieces on pallets being moved, and then I saw 1 guy move a piece with 1 hand after it fell on the floor..It was cardboard boxes stacked up on pallets...All that hype for empty boxes....

So you tell me...are they "re-assembling it off camera and running it by the camera to make it look like they had product"????????

Did they paint the cardboard boxes to look different?