InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Jestiron

05/26/10 10:16 AM

#203163 RE: uzualsuzpect #203156

He better be able to back the statement up then. I cannot imagine a Susman hip shot with that statement. He must have back-up. Or he better!

-Jest
icon url

steel58

05/26/10 10:24 AM

#203165 RE: uzualsuzpect #203156

UZ -- After reading, I would tend to agree with statement that it was not ivestigated to death. Supporting documentation backs that up. If it were investigated to death, then debtors must be hiding lots of information, so either way EC should get access to what it needs. JMW shouldn't ake it personally. She was only going by what Weil said, assuming they weren't lying. Now that proof exists they were, she should allow either discovery or examiner or both, plus serious sanctions against Weil.

If she doesn't then we have some serious problems. This case becomes almost unwinnable unless Solomon can make up some numbers and either have JMW believe him or at least have her force both sides to rework information. Anything short of that and we are screwed.
icon url

dmceng

05/26/10 10:31 AM

#203169 RE: uzualsuzpect #203156

uzual

You picked up on that one too! I read the entire motion last night and found that Steve S. tore into excerpts of JMW's decision with gusto. She did make some rather offhanded comments. I think the reason he called her out in a few selected statements is to alert her of her quirky comments and to forewarn her that denial of this motion will mean that there will be another appeal going to the 3rd Circuit this time involving Discovery involving JPMC.

Take Care
David
icon url

dmceng

05/26/10 10:46 AM

#203178 RE: uzualsuzpect #203156

uzual

Again be basically remind the Judge that discovery was incomplete as far as the EC is concerned. And he could care less if TGJMW is piZZED off. She made a questionable comment and waqs take to task for it.

Take Care
David