InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

uzualsuzpect

05/07/10 7:39 PM

#196359 RE: thepennyguy #196353

ThePennyGuy = TPG

Let's hope Sussy get's his game on...
icon url

uzualsuzpect

05/07/10 7:48 PM

#196360 RE: thepennyguy #196353

I had also posted this but removed... I had to read your post a few times.... I cut this out of my origional....



Read many of the longs and the legal minded ihub, Y!, or spooky's posts.

I, for one, am an idiot. Granted, I have read my "eyes out" over the past year. I have substituted (on some days) my degree for DD'ing WaMu.

After that lil statement

EC STEP UP! DO YOUR JOB!

... YOU NEED TO STEP BACK and let everyone do their jobs. YOU ARE A BANKRUPTCY STOCK INVESTOR... A ZOMBIE VULTURE!

The JMFW does NOT always RULE IN OUR FAVOR!!! Get F'n with it!!!Otherwise we would have had full 2004 back in the fall of 2009. We, IMO are lucky to have the 2004 that we got. No more bitchin' - just simply get a life, step back, or sell.

I am tired of all of the cryin and moaning - there is still a price to sell here before we are "cancelled".



Or maybe... I have misread or misinterpreted....
icon url

Gmenfan

05/07/10 7:54 PM

#196361 RE: thepennyguy #196353

With all do respect ... None of us have any idea what the EC is doing or what it has been doing since it's inception. I feel they are correct in not revealing their intentions. It seems that Rosen , JPM's attorney, is doing a fine job of letting the rope around his neck lengthen without the aid of any information from our EC.
icon url

dianebRN

05/08/10 10:53 AM

#196426 RE: thepennyguy #196353

That's a good point about the EC. My assumption is, looking backwards, that they couldn't because they were conflicted or in the process of being disapproved as counsel. Stalling tactic from the other side worked well. Finally got a counsel that was able to represent without conflict. IMHO and at this point too many documents etc to sort through. My "half full" answer anyway. GLTU