With all do respect ... None of us have any idea what the EC is doing or what it has been doing since it's inception. I feel they are correct in not revealing their intentions. It seems that Rosen , JPM's attorney, is doing a fine job of letting the rope around his neck lengthen without the aid of any information from our EC.
That's a good point about the EC. My assumption is, looking backwards, that they couldn't because they were conflicted or in the process of being disapproved as counsel. Stalling tactic from the other side worked well. Finally got a counsel that was able to represent without conflict. IMHO and at this point too many documents etc to sort through. My "half full" answer anyway. GLTU