InvestorsHub Logo

Yanik

04/29/10 6:25 PM

#193786 RE: SlyOne #193785

i disagree with you. a share is a share period.

chaarles

04/29/10 6:30 PM

#193793 RE: SlyOne #193785

Come on, how is it possible that this debate come here again.
.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........
this has been previously analyzed hundreds of times.

es1

04/29/10 11:22 PM

#193859 RE: SlyOne #193785

Answer this Sly.

If you think a "pre" could get paid and a "post" could not then you think it is ok for someone to be paid 2 times.

The shares that I have that are post seizure, were somebodies before sep 08. That person sold their shares at a profit or loss but that was up to them.

They got paid.

I bought their risk when I bought the Q shares. If the settlement comes, and the person I paid gets paid again that would be illegal. I took their risk on and I will receive the reward when it is paid.

Dont you agree that the above is true since the whole market system is based on the risk vs reward foundation?

amc

04/30/10 1:26 AM

#193879 RE: SlyOne #193785

Hasn't this topic been discussed enough?LOL