"Therooster and Logman stand up and must protest otherwise, to keep the scam and farce and criminality in play."
I do not, nor have I ever considered logman's or rooster's posts to be part of any conspiracy to scam any other investors.
I am fully aware that they are heavily invested and are probably out a lot of dough at this time. I'm also aware that my negative posts don't help their cause any, ergo they will challenge my posts, but I truly believe what I post about the company to be true. They have a lot to protect and I understand where they are coming from. It's just that I'm not buying the PWI BS anymore, especially with the ever growing amount of stock out there.
We have diametrically opposed views about the character of the company and it's management, obviously.
In spite of all that, I have also never deleted, censored or altered any of rooster's or logman's posts. I always let them have their say, regardless of content.
I have to say that I wonder if they would allow me to do the same, if rooster was in charge of this board.
PS: I will continue to expose the crooks involved in this deal, so if it is not what you want to read, consider this:
There are numerous other stock chat facilities out there, and as easy as it was to start this board, it would be as easy to start one on another web-hosting site. I think a totally pro PWI board is what Rooster and logman want, and they could restrict all negative posts to their hearts content. All of the members that want this type of positive only board would be happier there, I'm sure. I would have no objections to Loggie or rooster directing traffic to their site, from here.
I am not going away, and the lads at PWI could always sue me if I'm out of line. That is not unusual to negative posters on chat boards
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
