InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HighRider

04/25/10 8:10 PM

#34878 RE: StockCroupier #34877

They are hoping they don't have to go to court I bet. Some of the things they've done even from an outsiders standpoint are hard to believe. I still can't believe they got the first judgment. These guys have never had to answer the hard questions, which should be required for a $100 million dollar judgment. The time is now for them to tell us all about how Calypso has tried to screw them over, ha, ha, ha. I hope I can get up off the floor from laughing in time to watch the opening price on monday.
icon url

downsideup

04/26/10 1:46 PM

#34887 RE: StockCroupier #34877

The full and wholly circular logic of the reply seems to hinge on only three elements:

1. We've ignored all the facts we don't like... so they don't matter.

2. We're too stupid to understand any element of the complaint or to see the relevance given we ignore any facts we don't like... so they don't matter.

3. As in paragraph 12, Daic couldn't "not cooperate" where his cooperation was required... because his cooperation was required.

Bottom line, it is nothing other than a delay tactic and a fishing expedition...

I doubt there is any judge in Texas willing to sign on to their bald faced assertion that their purposeful ignorance, feigned stupidity and knowing illogic constitute a proper defense.

JMHO