InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

GEO928

04/09/10 2:18 PM

#103029 RE: artfink #103026

good observation.....but, if you're correct, that's not a good implication for the buy-back because the buy-back should have reduced the O/s to within proper relationship to the A/s regardless of how we figure the 40% share allocation....
icon url

Pathfinder85

04/09/10 2:30 PM

#103039 RE: artfink #103026

now i'm just playing devil's advocate here....


but if this whole thing isn't real, this PR gives Dean the ability to further dilute while maintiaining the "all systems are a go and nothing's wrong" storyline. O/S is higher than it was originally allowed to be? No problem, we don't have to give as many shares in the deal now.


Just saying... I think THAT is why you aren't seeing any positive price reaction today.
icon url

cosmoworld7

04/12/10 2:03 PM

#103701 RE: artfink #103026

Art, when is the anticipated closing loan date? Do you think Dean will be able to do it and accomplish goals for this company? I am asking for your opinion, because I know you are not the type of poster to either hype or bash but you are interested in cold hard facts. TIA.