By: hunter_gatherer0
21 Mar 2010, 05:21 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 116985 of 116985
Jump to msg. #
alwrong,
Who has a reading problem?
Posted by: alwright Date: Sunday, March 21, 2010 5:08:42 PM
In reply to: hunter_gatherer who wrote msg# 10354 Post # of 10355
SEO could be privy to all of the info as long as he doesn't trade based on that info. Think about it.
Read my post again befor your mind goes num again.
Here, I will give it to you.
Posted by: hunter_gatherer Date: Sunday, March 21, 2010 4:58:26 PM
In reply to: vineseeker2 who wrote msg# 10351 Post # of 10355
Vineseeker2,
Why do you think SEO should be privey to any more info than the rest of us other share holders?
Isn't he just another share holder, at this time?
I know he ownes a lot more than any one of us. All given by him, while he was in charge of ERHE, or is he still in charge? We own almost as much as he does, a little less, but does that give him the right to be privy to insider information while the rest of us investors are not?
If he gets insider info, just being an investor I would think that that would be illegal if he trades on it. Why can't the rest of us get that info also? If we don't trade on it?
If it was bad news and I sold the SEC wouldn't come after me...hunter
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
