InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Deano361

12/07/04 12:02 PM

#42800 RE: kateric10 #42799

If true, TW is Huge. Why would it not? I personally think it may be difficult to get main carrier like that because of the perception, but hey we got X rated TV, Here TV on Direct, why not Q?
icon url

mr_geronimo

12/07/04 12:03 PM

#42801 RE: kateric10 #42799

Any additional carrier would help. It would lend more credibility to the network and provide them with additional leverage (contract for 2006 Games + carriers = significant leverage).

In my opinion it's all a matter of time. The opportunity to offer the network to the Gay community cannot be resisted for long. I feel that demand is key. It's up to the community to request that their provider carry the network. Grass roots effort? You betcha.

Cheers

icon url

drinkyerwine

12/07/04 12:10 PM

#42803 RE: kateric10 #42799

TW would send this WAY UP !!

it would be a frenzy like we haven't seen....

so tell that credible guy to make it happen!!!

cheers....see ya at 3 cents++++++++


drinkyerwine
icon url

Deann

12/07/04 12:11 PM

#42804 RE: kateric10 #42799

kateric . . . I'm assuming you are talking about vegasdave, correct? He seems to be a good source. He was the one that called the signing of the gay games contract back on 11/21 (long before the PR confirming it on 12/6).

And even if it is only market by market, it should still get the pps moving upward by giving Q more potential for revenue. By how much though, I haven't a clue!

Deann.
icon url

BBSTOCK

12/07/04 12:15 PM

#42805 RE: kateric10 #42799

kateric10 , How Q got gay games contract ? Think about it ?