They have been doing this for over a year now. Nothing new and is to be expected from the FDIC. They keep filing and the judge keeps shutting them down... I dismissed it as soon as I read it...
Do we have any legal minds that can understand this? Not sure if they are expecting a court answer before Friday’s hearing. It should not rule out the judges SJ decision. Sounds like the motion is regarding liability on the Bonds.
Try not to think to much :-) saw something yesterday said we would be going to .31 today with links, articles, charts, opinions, facts, and everything in between ;-) lol
David West if this is enough to make you lose a little confidence, then for your own sake do not read every other objection they have filed in this case.
The Judge has made her decision on "not piercing the corporate veil."
Perhaps this is just a formality that must be filed to work this part out in the "global understanding". I highly doubt the Judge will allow this any more than she did when Clarke threatened to take the $4B deposit if she awarded to WMI!!! Silly Man!!