"The FDIC as receiver is not subject to the direction or supervision of any other agency or department of the United States or of any state, in the operation of the receivership. These provisions allow the receiver to operate without interference from other executive agencies and to exercise its discretion in determining the most effective resolution of the institution’s assets and liabilities."
I think you mean page 71, but the whole document is interesting. Incredible the FDIC power or I should say presumed power. Ridiculous! Basically stating they're above the law. WOW I think this is deeper than any of us expected. I don't think the FDIC will settle, JPIG (maybe) but the FDIC will fight this ofr years to come. I hope I'm wrong! Nice find fish!
If I am understanding the doc correctly then...it means that the FDIC has acted in a contrary manner in all of its responsibilities concerning WAMU, but there isn't any entity or power to whom they have to answer if they are the receiver??
Hopefully the key word for us is "failed". If we can prove that WAMU was solvent, then FDIC should have no grounds for what they did, even with this document.