InvestorsHub Logo

Chrisl

02/27/10 11:22 AM

#295259 RE: IQ1 #295258

IQ1,,,Can you please define what "Economic Receipt" is in legal form? Do not take the two words and make the definition up either. Find it in some case law somewhere.

bigbadjohn

02/27/10 12:28 PM

#295281 RE: IQ1 #295258

Oh so what you guys have been saying in the past is now all bullchit. I see so it's not 6.05 like wyatt and all the gurus were saying. I get it now.

So which guru spoke in which room to change your story?
We are trying to get the economic receipt and the codes for 3.8 trillion for attention. So the 1.2 trillion that the Bush crime family was just for attention too? If it was for attention, how did it go missing and then replaced.

So you are telling me also that World Reports is for attention too and nothing should be taken seriously about World Reports either then.

Thank you for explaining it clearly to everyone who has been trying to tell you that it is all bullchit and now you agree that it was gets to get peoples attention, which to me says it's bullchit.
Thank you

Janice I don't think you understand completely what we're going after. The Trillions is nothing more then to get peoples attention because of the large amount.

janice shell

02/27/10 3:40 PM

#295346 RE: IQ1 #295258

Janice I don't think you understand completely what we're going after. The Trillions is nothing more then to get peoples attention because of the large amount.

You don't file a complaint with a monetary demand for $3.87 trillion just to "get people's attention". Judges expect lawsuits to be serious legal actions, not publicity stunts.