InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

redskinpride

02/21/10 10:37 AM

#152518 RE: daulton #152517

great post Daulton. Thanks!
icon url

umaw

02/21/10 10:58 AM

#152522 RE: daulton #152517

Daulton and All

While this is a good find. I don't belive it is a road map for stipulating there, will in fact, be a termination of litigation. I think in this case and any other cases, this is a common procedure of confidentiality in how business is conducted and/or how decisions were made. While, I don't feel this is "right" by any means, I just feel it protects all parties brought to the table in litigation. This happens everyday in legal wrangling. When somebody agrees to admit all or partial fault or guilt, then many details get "swept under the rug" in the process in all or part of sacrificing a lamb. Again, I do not agree with this and remember I have a ton of skin in this game and would like nothing more than to see Jamie Dimon and all of his cronies get hung at high noon in the middle of the town square. Seriously........IMO...GLTA.....

icon url

jhdf51

02/21/10 12:56 PM

#152540 RE: daulton #152517

#33 Procedure Upon Termination of Litigation

Very interesting as it talks about Once litigation and appeal period ends....returning papers back to originating party or destroying them. hmmm It does provide further hints of a settlement..
icon url

Roach58

02/21/10 4:03 PM

#152595 RE: daulton #152517

For what reason is the Official Committee of Equity Holders not referenced in this court document. Surely, they have information that the bad guys don't want released. It just seemed to be conspicuously missing from the document...unless I just missed it. Any legal minds out there have any insight on this?