InvestorsHub Logo

Stock

02/17/10 3:45 PM

#220579 RE: Ranb2khz #220574

...You cross over to my zone and we seem to have several differences...

Let's see what we have discussed in the past 14 months (before today):

Only CIT. A now worthless stock. And their preferred Z shares, now also worthless.

Board Subject Author Date/Time

Cit Grp. Prfd Z (fka CIT-Z) My mistake - the hearing started before lunch. Generic 12/8/2009 1:12:27 PM

Cit Grp. Prfd Z (fka CIT-Z) court''s not even in session yet Generic 12/8/2009 12:56:59 PM

Cit Grp. Prfd Z (fka CIT-Z) didn''t tank - all the other shares -- Generic 12/8/2009 12:47:20 PM

CIT Group, Inc. New Common Treasury said they were "closely watching" the CIT Generic 12/4/2009 6:36:05 PM

CIT Group, Inc. New Common Do you think the US Government will oppose? Generic 12/4/2009 6:25:49 PM

----

Posted by: Rikkitik
Date: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:05:04 PM
In reply to: Generic who wrote msg# 12 Post # of 16

The smart money is in the know here. ~IMO

---

Posted by: Rikkitik
Date: Friday, December 04, 2009 6:31:34 PM
In reply to: Generic who wrote msg# 3218 Post # of 3439

U.S. taxpayers only count for "x" funds to the federal budget - we're a number with a value and that's all. If the judge requires them to work another package which saves the tax dollars, then that may produce a bounce as well.


==================

...then you started spewing your false accusations outside the official stock realm for it, so I felt obligated to follow and rebut the lies that were being spewed with the truth as it was.

I guess you're saying you don't like the content of some of my posts some place on iHub.

Maybe you should respond to the posts you don't like, on the boards where I posted them, rather than coming here to fling shit.

---------------

Thanks for not being a rebel without a clue.

Buckey

02/17/10 3:48 PM

#220584 RE: Ranb2khz #220574

havent we decided to stop talking about it take your hype to your lovefest.

anyone got any runners into close any divy plays