InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

goldbarren58

01/29/10 11:19 AM

#291251 RE: hasher #291249

If it ain't on pacer

it don't count for nuthin
icon url

fung_derf

01/29/10 11:25 AM

#291253 RE: hasher #291249

Geez! How many times is this case going to get posted on here?
What's funny is, if you know nothing about the story, the case sounds somewhat legit. However, with a shred of updating, it's so obvious as to the holes of the case.
I have to wonder how well versed any judge would be on the whole picture before rendering any decisions?
icon url

JJSeabrook

01/29/10 5:14 PM

#291281 RE: hasher #291249

LOL I figure this is a ZERO. Anyone actually planning to get something from this suit, other than enough to buy you a big coke at McDonalds, is expecting far more than you're likely to receive. Your invalid stock certificate is worth more, for the knowledge it represents, than what anyone will get.

Regarding to the waiver of service under FRCP 4(d), they have 30 days to respond to that request, and then IF they agree to waive service, they will then have an additional 60 days to file an Answer. That's an automatic 90 days before even an answer to the lawsuit would come. It's the cheap, and easy way, to pursue litigation in Federal Court, but instead of serving a defendant and they have to file a response in 20 days, this provides a 90 day period to file an answer. It's NOT a fast track to getting a response, but a cheaper method of getting one.

I don't think it's going to matter one way or the other, but it's interesting to watch. I still have my Cert, FWIW.

Best of luck to all!

JJ
icon url

mathias1

01/31/10 11:04 AM

#291519 RE: hasher #291249

I can't believe Hodges is actually turning to these conspiracy theory whackjobs for support. His lawsuit becomes a bigger joke every day.