InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Snackman

01/07/10 10:32 AM

#185844 RE: Elan Vital #185843

Some of the things you guys come up with are amazing. You are nick picking about the words automaker and automotive company? LOL

An automaker IS an automotive company. Come on guys, there must be better things to tax your minds then this.

Can't you all just feel good about the TOTAL announcement, and see the ramifications of what it is going to do to the success of this company?






$10 'N 2010,(or better) that is our goal.
icon url

24601

01/07/10 10:42 AM

#185846 RE: Elan Vital #185843

Elan asks a valid question: "Why 'automaker' in the header and 'automotive company' in the text?"

If I were looking for a rational reason to write ---
--- "automaker" to describe the global identity of the company in the headline, but
--- "automotive company" to describe the U.S.-based identity of the company in the text,
my first hypothesis would be a foreign automaker who has assembly plants in the U.S.

===================

P.S. For anybody who doubts that Tour is a fabricator, try to find an instance of "that 'stealth' stuff" being promoted by me, or even an instance in which I have used that term (other than in reference to aerospace technology).






icon url

remote control

01/07/10 10:42 AM

#185848 RE: Elan Vital #185843

Elan,
Are you really trying to prove the point that this is somehow not an Automaker? Really? Do you really wish to infer that this is ONLY a parts supplier, and "Automotive" company only due to the fact that Automotive appears somewhere in text after AUTOMAKER? Seriosly, I mean his with all due respect, are you afraid that this is a deliberate corporate attempt to deceive shareholders and Wall Street? I think many here would support the next statement. The time has come to dispense with the fear mongering, the sky is falling inuendo, the leadership is forever and only capable of deceptive practices etc.. Let me ask you a very simple question. Do you think it is possible that this company has been working their butts off to bring a paradigm changing technology to the mainstream market? I am AS UNHAPPY as anyone here with how long this has taken to occur. Peoplewho know me know this to be ALL TOO TRUE. But unlike others here and on other boards, I CHOOSE not to think that the problems stem from the very worst of all possible human conditons; greed, avarice etc.. The market is trying to tell you that it is real, and that there is a future as the company becomes profitable. The due dilegence that has been literally placed into your lap by many very intelligent and committed members here has given you an advantage that many people outside this community do not presently have any awareness of, namely that there is a hardware based security solution that is gaining traction in corporate America. You may choose at this point to ignore those facts and dwell on the past, I for the record will focus on the potential of this emerging market. For the shares I buy today at less than $2 will be a gift from CM, AWK, and others as they helped me make decisions to understand that this is in fact a stock that will undoubtly reach 5, very likely reach 10, has an real opportunity to reach 20, and with wider market adoption someday pass $50 a share. In the mean time, keep focusing on the meaning of Automaker vs. Automaotive while I purchase cheap shares that you were to afraid too buy.

Thank you for your fear, in the long run it makes me wealthier.

Remote control