InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hestheman

01/06/10 10:41 AM

#133529 RE: Sculelos #133526

It does not matter....JPM took tarp. Furthermore Sculelos, I genuinely believed that in the beginning you were upset about selling. If you sold, move on. Don't come back to do the subtle bashing.
icon url

hotmeat

01/06/10 10:41 AM

#133530 RE: Sculelos #133526

So called debt(LONGTERM) yet theyre making a mint off the companys ill gotten assets. the same assets that all the pundits were calling TOXIC
icon url

Lawrence 147

01/06/10 10:41 AM

#133531 RE: Sculelos #133526

To bad that argument won’t hold. WMI owes JPM nothing and because WMI prepaid the taxes for the banks and has not been recompensed JPM has no claim. There can be many arguments but it is the law that matters. JPM has presented no valid claim.
icon url

Vulcanized Crawler

01/06/10 10:42 AM

#133532 RE: Sculelos #133526

you dont realize tarp precludes jpm from nol's or did you forget when you went dark side? also, the nol's are for when jpm had nothing to do with wamu, except they were planning the theft. if jamie had thought about the treasury job....he might have paid up, like he did with bear sterns and avoided all this....now get back on board and stop doing jw's job.
icon url

wamuvoodoo

01/06/10 10:55 AM

#133546 RE: Sculelos #133526

70billion of debt that jamie being tight w/ politics he knew the gov't was going to be buying the toxic debt,remember borock and jamie were buddies in chicago days and he knew borock was gonna win the election