InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

blueone

11/15/09 2:48 PM

#7291 RE: rstar #7289

Rkor, Thanks for both your explanation and your civility. I agree about Joe and his tweets, plus many of us here would rather see JN gone than continue his "style" of being an IR guy. Its possible that Biel's auditors have asked that he reign in his hype and spin, but that hypothesis will be tested this week.

I agree with ryoko that some indication about the FDA meeting is due and expected rather soon for us shareholders. After all, Joe should not tweet the expectation about the possibility of the meeting "breaking the logjam" and then withdraw into silence. If there is no report/tweet/PR about the meeting on Monday, people might well assume there is a "hold" by FDA, and then wonder about a "reset" for the timeline, in which case you would be spot on in your analysis about delays.

I'm not sure that either the unaudited Q or the tylenol study will be sufficient for a Monday spike, but then again we do appear to be on the cusp of major momo, and its always hard to tell what might set that in forward motion.
icon url

Randolph Duke

11/15/09 3:13 PM

#7296 RE: rstar #7289

"as it become more clear that approval is a ways away"

A ways away? You base this on what? I do not think anything is clear in regards to approval date. Saying it's "clearly a ways away" is just as irresponsible as claiming approval tomorrow. I agree JN tweets are silly. Maybe we get the FDA update in the Monday PR? who knows. I also agree we may see a dip if no approval by Thanksgiving week- but i do not think we will pullback below .06 IMO- good luck all.