Replies to post #184059 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[Donald Duck]

go-kitesurf, totally agree.

[oknpv]

go-Kite....I am obviously not tech savvy & so I have been under the delusion that the massive breaches like Heartland, TJMAXX, the reports of stolen PCs world-wide, hackers getting "inside" data storage & company systems, resulting in massive monetary damage & ID theft, etc....could have been prevented by our products & TPMs. Also the newer SED with management for enterprises. So maybe the existing firewalls that have been around for quite a long time while this all happened is the best after all......I would be the last to know.

So all these OEMs have been duped into adding TPMs into their products when they dont matter. The use of TC by INTC & the big internet companies as if they will ultimately be the standard for security sure had me fooled.....With these legions of OEMs, engineers, cranking out millions of Trusted Products it must be someone's fault that they arent turned on yet. Could just one CEO from one start-up company be responsible for this state of affairs?

[keV]

gks..


sks has been that way for quite a few years, and the bod refuses to do its job for the shareholders.

[wavedreamer]

go-kitesurf,

"Until the large shareholders here start pressuring sks to create a service instead of more clubs, committees and advisory boards, wave will continue to be a $1 stock".


It's better than the $.50 price I paid a year ago! What did they add in that time? Gee, could it be revenue growth?

"Wave needs to show MASSIVE growth to hit $20 a share".

Smartest thing I've read from you in 3 years and I agree! LOL

Stay tuned!

P/S loosen your belt buckle!

[Wildman262]

Go, now you are being downright cynical. Adding this advisory committee of Lords, Dukes, Sirs and Barons is the last puzzle in the piece for sks to own Europe!! I heard Benny Hill was going to be included, but he and the little bald guy had some other commitments.