Replies to post #255630 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[tturner617]

If you believe Patch has inside info about SEC handing the case over to the DOJ, Then you still need conformation as to who or what the case is pointed. Up to now, there are good reasons to believe it could be against SPNG, or could be against SPNG mgmt, or could be against RM, or could be against an individual SPNG/RM director (past or present) or could be against an outside force that has used illeagle stk minip, or could be against an outside force that has shorted the stk illeagaly, or could be against.... No definitive "proof" of any of these. All public info is vague enough to include all of these senerios.

[52wkhi]

and i thought i had heard it all

[ID Supermoney]

So you are claiming your proof on HERESAY??

Now that is FACT! LOL

ID

[mesmero]

I don't know patch, and certainly do not trust the word of someone on an anonymous message board. What is his source? Has it been validated? Is it common practice for the SEC to share their actions with patch before dissemination to the general public? Doesn't that constitute "privileged information"? Isn't that illegal?


If that is indeed the case, you are basing your supposition on the fact that the SEC is behaving criminally. Is that really what you believe? That a person, or persons at the SEC have somehow decided to confide in this "patch" at the risk of their jobs at the very least.