InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JohnnyWinter

11/06/09 12:42 PM

#118706 RE: erevno #118704

Simply because the money is in a demand deposit account does not mean that the money should have been transferred there. Everybody knows that the money is in a dda, and nobody is arguing that it is not.

There will be discovery concerning the transfer of this money.

Logan's testimony was only the beginning.
icon url

Dragynn

11/06/09 12:48 PM

#118709 RE: erevno #118704

The Judge can rule at any time. Nothing stands in her way now, Judge Collyer cleared the way, and affirmed that Judge Walrath has the jurisdiction. THJMW has had a year to consider this, and all the evidence in the world, a trial would be redundant in light of the fact that it wouldn't be a jury trial, it would just be the same arguments, from the same people, decided by the same judge.

It's a simple psychological ploy to make a declarative statement, a tactic to convince someone that your position is fact and a foregone conclusion. Doesn't make it so.

No one knows what the Judge will do at this point, no one but the judge herself.

So we wait.