Replies to post #47767 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[Rock_nj]

No need for a reverse split. The company can buy back shares from free cash flow. This is one Pink that can actually do a buyback. Nice! A reverse split serves no purpose here. To go to the OTC:BB, they don't need a R/S. To go to the Amex, they would, but it would be a lot bigger than 1 for 3, and Expo doesn't have the revenues for Amex right now, so it will not happen.

A company buy back announcement is what this stock needs to move higher, that and all the good revs from late this year and 2010.

[fourkids_9pets]

nope .. been there and done that
on another legit co. that went all
the way to the naz ~ imo they covered
all the way to uplist ;-) .. it was
quite the sight to watch *firsthand*
and it made millionaires out of local
and loyal longs ~ btw .. that run was
13 months ~ i see many similar parallels
with expo/exph ~

--
4kids
all jmo

[goldstandard]

I don't disagree that they stink at all. Only thing is if you want to uplist to AMEX, which I believe is the goal, you have to reduce O/S. Notice I said eoy 2010 on into 2011. If they incur the rev's from ETC they believe they will (with 40% profit margins), 20-30 million $ profits will make no difference about an r/s, only to make you more $. E
But I am getting ahead of myself, just playing out a possible scenario. As said IF revenues warrant it. 20mil profit divided by say 333,333,000 O/S is much much better than the same at 1bil. Down the road of course. Not gonna stay at 1bil O/S forever. IMHO. Go EXPH!

[Lurker from Mars]

If insiders have all their shares:

return 50%, do a 1:5 R/S which would bring shares to 168mil...

$15mil 2010 or more...Where would pps go to?...20% profit

1mil shares x .03 (w/10 mult) = $30,000 (current)


1mil / 5 = 200k
200k x .18 (w/10 mult) = $35,714

not much of a difference, but shows that even a small R/S could be good in the LONG run.....Company has higher pps to sell some treasury to get uplist money faster...JMO