SSC,
Go back and read your posts. YOU ARE POSTER DOING THE BASHING, ANY TIME ANOTHER POSTER POSTS NUMBERS ABOVE YOUR $1 TO $2 PER SHARE NUMBER.
From my perspective you are the Jonestown fanatic, telling everyone it is all over you may as well drink and move on to something else.
Why do you think a $10 to $20 price is so inconceivable and requires you to throw out scorn and derision when someone mentions it.
I brought forth three salient issues regarding the uncertainty of price high or low and why it is not imporbbale to suggest that the chinese may be willing to wrap this baby up now before too much is known and you did not touch on nor refute any of them.
Instead, you arm chair quarterback from the back row and heckle anyone that puts forth a positive reason why the share price could be a higher number.
I for one think that SEO's buy-out number (for the whole ball of wax) is $10 billion which equates to about $27.75 share.
DO I know that, no I don't. DO I have verifiable facts that validate that number, no I don't. How do I know that number, the truth it is just my gut feeling having been a part of this stock for 4 years and a member of the energy community for over 35 years.
BUT is my reasoning just as valid as your $1 to $2 per share number? Probably more so, because you only look at the well or wells being drilled and not what the implied valued could be.
Respond to the three reasons I laid out for you on the last e-mail and given them tell me why you still feel anything above $2/share is unreasonable.
Until you do I will ask all posters here to just consider you what you are....another of the M&M "de jour" bashers.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
