InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

QuidRunner

10/03/09 11:19 AM

#18942 RE: jufel #18940

Jufel,

That 20M three weeks ago may have been due to buying and selling the same day. Yeah, a lot on this board may have held, but there are a lot of investors that do not post on this board - much less read it.

The whole R/S coming TWO months or more after the amendment makes NO sense to me and NOR does it even sound legal. Not sure if it is legal or not though.

The rest of your theory appears to be based on a R/S, which I just don't believe is the case.

It would only take cost them 200K to buy back 2 Billion shares at $.0001....

Who knows, you may be proven correct in two or three weeks. However, I personally don't feel your theory is accurate.

Either way, I wish you the best...
icon url

fishingincea

10/03/09 11:54 AM

#18946 RE: jufel #18940

Great analysis. can't agree more
icon url

DDhawk

10/03/09 12:17 PM

#18951 RE: jufel #18940

jufel; I'm fullly aligned w/your thinking....
with the possible exception of the 1.45BB (1/09) Pinksheets O/S vs. the 1.23BB TA (current) O/S. We know these figures to be: "Facts"we can work with.
This would suggest to me that 220MM may well have been retired or otherwise, taken off the market to be used as restricted shares etc.
One way or another; I see us all as being 'big winners' here.
The other 'wild rumor' floating around here, based on a (questionable)"highly reliable source" is potentially very harmful if proven wrong, which, I believe it will be. The math just doesn't work. I'll gladly be wrong on this but I don't think I am.
On the flip-side, it has also been suggested by 'respected' member of our board that the the share structure may well undergo 'no' changes at...just because a different structure is 'proposed' ("future option"...Nevada SOS) doesn't mean they have to enact it. I know this to be a possibility because I've seen it happen before.
Bottom line; We seem to be coming to a consensus that .10/.20 cents isn't out of the question here.
GLTA


aimo