InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Threeflight

10/01/09 2:02 PM

#26770 RE: DTS2468 #26768

As I stated, because I figured this would have a run up into that Sept 30 date. I bought around .04 and sold not much later at around .07, well before the Sept 30 date. In fact last week when they announced that acquistion PR, I advised everyone to SELL, at .07 mind you. The writing was on the wall then. I trade the STOCK, not the company. Never fall in love with a company, unless its symbol is MRNA lol.
icon url

Threeflight

10/01/09 2:06 PM

#26772 RE: DTS2468 #26768

As I sated in the post, "Im not saying the merger will happen, but it should run on pre hype".

Why is that so hard to grasp?
icon url

Superhoops

10/01/09 2:19 PM

#26776 RE: DTS2468 #26768

I too think TF has gloated on this a bit much, BUT he has been absolutely right with his observations... and he is obviously very, very aware of this company, the goals, the CEO, and the potential... He knows this thing will blow big if it closes...

And because of that, maybe he is drawn to this stock "like a moth to a flame"...

Look at it as testament to it's potential WHEN this manages to close... and frankly, if this price is dipping like this (to the 2's??), if we were excited before, we should be grinning from ear to ear!!

FWIW
icon url

Superhoops

10/01/09 4:01 PM

#26784 RE: DTS2468 #26768

DTS: I can't PM but thanks for the welcome to the Board! BTW, does anyone know the ihub equivalent in England?... It would be interesting to find out their take on this...
icon url

MiamiGent

10/02/09 3:34 AM

#26793 RE: DTS2468 #26768

Hi DTS, thanks for caring.
I guess a lot has to do with competing wishes of traders and holders. Our expressions probably reflect our wishes to some degree, even though we may feel we are being objective.
For instance, recently I abandoned a long held stock at a profit. Then I had the urge to tell the board that I believed the AR was way out of line and a looming problem. I had to ask myself what was my objective- to educate, to validate my decision, or just to re-enter later. I concluded it was primarily to educate, but I was conscious of a whirl of undefined impetuses just below the surface. So, understanding there is a commonality to these things, I guess we have to watch what we are told, even from ourselves!
I added a little late the afternoon of the bad news, and a little more the following day, yesterday. If the pps is off again today, I am ready to add more. Not having a longstanding feel for RTGV, I'm relying on scaled down averaging- too many vagaries for me to try and time it.
The additional buying speaks to a hunch that RTGV will be a winner.
I believe the delay is defendable- barely so, though.
Let's pray our investments in RTGV bear fruit!
Thanks for the dd, big khuna, that A products won't be an aspect of the merged co.
Healthy discourse on this board- I enjoy reading, reflects well the moderator, assistants and posters.
GLTA