bdahl385, that is the most sensable, logical and IMO accurate rebuttal opinion that has been posted on this board for quite sometime.
I mean step back for a moment and ask the question.
Why would any other third party person witnin a company answer such an e-mail requestion from an unknown source on behalf of another company. If I'm not mistaking such a misled answer could really put such a person in a poor situation.
Last I heard confidentiality was still a very strong issue and if crossed over in the wrong manner that individual or individuals could get into some hot water........... quickly
If the participants are so upset with the manner that Hemi has proceeded, then IMO keep it between you and Hemi....directly.
But to go out and ask a 3rd party source that has not been confirmed by the other direct..........1st party??
I mean really where is the business logic or common sense behind that?
And if an anwser was provided what would it mean and what validation would it have for Hemi?
Kels