Replies to post #70907 on RCC Holdings Corp fka RCCH

[Pythia]

Please tell us the shell's name

[EarnestDD]

You can claim lots of things ... but the fact of the matter is ... you have ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF of a merger into a TSX Shell.

TSX Shells have a finite life ... do a deal or be delisted.

IF they had one ... time is ticking.
IF they had one ... directors would have had to be disclosed.
IF they had one ... deal would have had to be disclosed.

So ... NO PROOF ... just more Fluffy Stories from Gene.

And Gene's fairy tales continue.
jmo

[frogdreaming]

It's OK to not understand the process, which you clearly don't, but you do need to listen to those who do understand it.

If there is going to be an uplist/reverse merger (whatever you want to call it) to the TSX (or TSXV) exchange, the shell you are going to merge with needs to be listed there already. That means that some other shell that RCCH may or may not own is irrelevant, it cannot be the shell in question unless it is already listed on the exchange. If it is already listed it is public knowledge and you can divulge it.

Before TSX (or TSXV) will even look at a merger, there HAS TO BE a pr from BOTH the company and the shell explaining the deal and naming the officers. This is not an opinion it is a documented requirement that has been repeated here several times, but ignored by those who don't want to believe it.

If, as you claim, TSX (or TSXV) is the one holding up the deal, then that PR must have been published already. If it has not yet occurred, then TSX (or TSXV) is not yet looking at the merger and cannot be responsible for the delay.

So, do you know the name of the already listed TSX (or TSXV) shell that is going to be involved in the merger/uplist, or don't you?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Do you think that the merger/uplist is already in the hands of the TSX (or TSXV) or don't you?

If the answer to the previous question is yes, can you provide a link to the PR from the company and the shell that must have already happened?

If the answer to that question is no, can we please stop hearing about the TSX (or TSXV) holding up the deal?

Thanks in advance for your response.