InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockhound

09/12/04 1:52 AM

#94688 RE: janice shell #94681

That's $10 million Janice.

SGGM has no cash, no business, no assets, so it's reasonable to assume that a "related party" is putting up the $10 billion. Is it the same "related party"?

Looks like one of my mistakes.
icon url

Jim Bishop

09/12/04 10:26 AM

#94728 RE: janice shell #94681

SGGM .37 and it saw .75? ... apparently... I AM ...a monkey's uncle

icon url

gump90

09/12/04 12:38 PM

#94751 RE: janice shell #94681

Hey Janice .. Fess Up !!!
You do not know what is happening any more than the rest of us. This must be tearing you apart [a little bit anyhow]. Your hoped-for scam is still alive and kicking strongly. Juicy !!!! I luv' it. And this has a long way to go yet.
icon url

Ignutz

09/12/04 12:54 PM

#94758 RE: janice shell #94681


Janice, you don't, but do you think Roger might understand?

” … Frankly I don't understand what's sustaining the price ...”