Replies to post #11855 on One Step Ahead

[Drillbit]

I am sure that that has been considered by Glenn's braintrust. IMO, the MM's do not want any kind of legal action that will expose naked shorting as it is much too profitable. I also could see other MM's, that aren't naked shorting CMKX but other pinks, kick in for avoiding the above premise.

[Hunter1206]

According to my full service broker at the bank. First MM would be responsible, Second Persching would be responsible, Third U-Vest would be responsible,Fourth broker and bank would be responsible. As I was told these shares were sold to me and someone will have to make good on them like it or not. This broker also told me that he could pretty much garantee that CMKX has been shorted out the ying/yang. For anyone who would be interested I have also received my statement from U-Vest which has under Securities Not Yet Received UCAD Ex dvd date is 00/00/00 distribution date is 09/24/04 quantity held 7,500,000 rate .000009 exactly what all this means I don't know, but I am sure that there are some that do. GLTY.