InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

STEHSUCKER

09/06/04 9:12 AM

#8296 RE: alj14 #8293

>> BTW, it's "recommend". <<

Sorry... been sick as a dog all weekend (flu) and didn't spell check ;-)

Regarding MVSN, I'm not saying they are the safer choice technology wise, I'm saying they are the safer choice COMPANY wise. No one could doubt MVSN will be around in five years, but the same can not be said for Sunncomm... so my point (repetitivly) was that we desperately need to address the corporate governance issues to increase our odds of being chosen.

I have not argued that Sunncomm's technology isn't better, in fact they've been very clever for an incredibly small company, but you have to comprehend that MVSN will now be developing nearly exactly what Sunncomm is offering, so our advantage there is temporary.

>> What counts now is that SCMI has stated quite clearly that when a second major label signs on for a full partnership, the whole procedure for moving on to a proper market will swing into action. <<

This is what I was told and understood as well, that is until I was told otherwise by management. I was told this is not a priority and that's what I have an issue with. When I believed as you, and still had confidence in management, I was happy to be patient and wait.

>> IMO, your delight in piling on the agony is really running away with you here. <<

I don't see how reasoned discussion constitutes "piling on" ?? My points are valid, there is a problem, and the share price is indicative of it... to argue otherwise is simply to be blinded by the dream (and Peter's sliver tongue).
icon url

stehvestor

09/06/04 10:25 PM

#8310 RE: alj14 #8293

It's a bloody shame you are so interested in proper english and spelling.

This is not an english class, and I do not think many like to be brought on the carpet for some typo.

What counts now is that SCMI has stated quite clearly that when a second major label signs on for a full partnership, the whole procedure for moving on to a proper market will swing into action.

They have stated that for the past two years or so and no we still are in the same position as we were when first stated.

The second major may be just a hope.

believe that the paramount interest of the majors in getting valid copy management of CDs will now allow SCMI's business plan to be implemented quite quickly, and so place SunnComm in an extremely strong position.


I believe that the paramount desire of the majors is piracy protection, something the shift key fiasco changed scmi's
initial "piracy protection" to "copy management", playability
and total protection is the real goal. I believe that is the main reason the second major has not and may not sign.

Of course if my english isn't proper, perhaps you may still understand the point I am making. jmho