InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

merlyn

09/02/04 11:19 AM

#8142 RE: berg111 #8138

I've had a grip on SCMI for years now Berg. Don't know how long you've been here, but if you've been here for a while, you'd know how long we've been promised to file and get off the pinks (last year, the year before, etc). I understand it takes PPS to get off the pinks, but we aren't even trying to get to the first step which is filing. Instead, SCMI is coming up with another "plan" to "Get Shorty". Well, in case you weren't around, our previous "plan" to "Get Shorty" was making 11 divisions of SCMI which obviously didn't work and quite possibly made the situation worse. What we should have done was merge QTIG and SCMI into one company which would have taken care of our repoting status. Our reporting would have made us more attractive to larger institutions and investors, which would boost our PPS to take the next step to jumping of the pinks. Also, you're 50% right. If EMI signs and we still don't make a move to reporting, I'm damn sure gonna complain more. Luckily, I'm in a position where I can hold my shares for as long as I want because they're free, but I still want to make money. Berg, what you are seeing manifest on this board is the frustrations of true longs who have towed the line for SCMI for a long time. These longs are tired of "Get Shorty" plans. They want to see this company grow up already and start acting like we are the number company for DRM.

icon url

alj14

09/02/04 6:04 PM

#8171 RE: berg111 #8138

Berg111,

That's a great post you have written -- refreshing and absolutely to the point. I agree 200%.

alj14