Replies to post #20562 on BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[opportunityknocking]

I can't stand whenever Biocurex (Dr Moro) has progress to report and new novel ideas to expand the use of recaf to Kag and Goldseeker that is hype.
Please stop equating progress with hype. That is not what Dr Moro is doing and it is your only way to refute that he is indeed making progress (in the medical space he is working at the speed of light). There is no one with the aptitude of Dr Moro when it comes to recaf, and the fact that Goldseeker is trying to go head to head and rebut a proven medical miracle and a huge leap forward in understand ALL TYPES OF CANCER is astonishing. It is clear as day that this technology WILL save lives and because 2 individuals can't grasp the magnitude of this discovery and try every angle to disway unsuspecting readers of this board, it certainly does not mean that Abbott and Inverness don't get it. On the contrary, they are working diligently EVERYDAY toward commercialization. Pick up the phone and call the lab.
You will see that Dr Moro AGAIN will return to upcoming ISOBM and what is he going to do there in front of the most respected and knowledgeable scientists in the world. Is he the world's greatest illusionist?
The FACT that he had investors lined up speaks volumes.

[Gold Seeker]

The Bocx, One last time, You are wrong and you obviously do not understand why.

Do you understand ODDS?

When you flip a coin, the odds of heads or tails coming up is 50%. If the toss came up tails, then what are now the odds of tails coming up again? Well, according to the argument you are making with the positive mamogram, you would have said the odds of getting tails on the second toss would be 25%. That is absolutely wrong. The odds on the flip of a coin are 50% each and every time.

When Jane doe has a mamogram, her odds of an actual cancer do not decrease because another patient had a positive mamogram that was cancerous last week.

So once again, look at Jane doe's mamogram and lets say that for that particular roll of the dice, the lesion is positive. Now, you give Jane a RECAF test. OOPS, RECAF has a 15% odds of missing that positive test and absolutely NOT the small percentage you quoted. Now, do you finally understand?

GoldSeeker™