Replies to post #259378 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[my3sons87]

O'dog, I have been reading the following transcript of Lanning. Talk about testilying, in my opinion this guy takes the cake. He could not understand something that would be common to those skilled in the art until he called some Samsung lawyers. Levi, nailed his azz in the corner on that issue and the ALJ noted it as well. IMO, it goes to show that anyone with $2.00 can buy any story they want.

http://edisweb.usitc.gov/edismirror/337-601/Violation/305260/373730/126c/9cc79c.pdf

[techinvester]

Hi Olddog,

I read pages 2302 – 2318. No mention during the testimony by Mr Lanning while we were in the court room similar to the transcript. i.e. No mention of the libraries in Germany or Brittan or Ms. Hagemann. The only mention of Lucas during the testimony of Mr Lanning that I recall from my notes was that Lucas was a part of CODIT which thanks to your link I now know what CODIT means. It was a 1 time mention as I recall kind of out of the blue.

Ellis – If you remember any other mention of Lucas by Mr Lanning please chime in.

FYI - Mr Lanning was already sworn in and seated when we returned from a previous witness’s confidential testimony. They were still establishing his Qualifications as an expert in cellular architecture so I assumed we only missed the oath and a few introductory statements but that is only my assumption.

I also read the 1st 30 pages of the 1st transcript. The one thing I did not state in part 4 of my summary was that the testimony of Mr Lanning is not done. The Nokia lawyer stated at ~noon it was a convenient time to break for the day. After reading the document you provided the link for, I now ASSUME everything we heard from Mr Lanning APPEARS TO ME to only be a possible set up for entry into a discussion of the Lucas paper and it’s association with the current CDMA based cellular architecture. i.e. Describing the method of data transmission using spreading code, the method of power ramp up currently used and the mention of Lucas and association with CODIT. If my tea leaf reading above is correct, Tuesday should be a pretty key day. This also makes the discussion of remaining time left stated by IDCC and the strong objection by Nokia to extending the case time line much more meaningful. i.e. Will IDCC be given adequate time to cross question Mr Lanning. I will try to read more of the transcripts provided later tonight.

Once again this is just me trying to read tea leaves and JMHO.