InvestorsHub Logo

sf

05/21/09 11:37 PM

#73277 RE: jackson227 #73261

i think judge walrath is not ruling because she is extending a favor by not pigeon holing jpm by setting case law for futher takedowns of banks with holding companies. with legislation pending, that fdic is trying to push through. to supercede constitution to give them authority to take down private holding companies with their banks. i think she is saying to jpm...get this mess handled quietly or i will handle it for you! her ruling will cut jpm at their knees and stop the rest of their proposed takedowns from ever happening.it is in fdic and jpm best interest to handle this and handle this fast or their conspiracy will be exposed and their ongoing bank robberies cannot resume with the support of treasury. the govt is implicated. fdic couldnt have taken wmi and wmb down without someone higher up knowing...ie treasury, congress, president. they had no authority but they "got" the authority from somewhere and all on the backs of taxpayers. watch the show!!! too many people would be exposed. they will conveniently make this all go away very soon. jpm has to get their monies frozen by france and italy back too. this is definitely a global settlement. pay to play ponzi scheme to the extreme!!! jmo