InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FlySpeck

05/21/09 4:16 PM

#13503 RE: maskone #13502

I guess I wasn't clear. I'm saying if there is an increase in PPS in my opinion it will come largely from T3 sales and not from CXAC sales.
icon url

magtv

05/21/09 4:22 PM

#13505 RE: maskone #13502

Read the past PR (I belevie 3rd from last). We are sharing in revenue, the %'s are not known. CXAC is providing the Marketing and sell center for OMG!, Todd indicated to me that all OMG revenue will flow through CXAC and CXAC will out a % to T3.

We are in a partnership, but are independent companies. For lack of a better analogy, its like KFC and Taco Bell sharing the same building (or whatever businesses often share the same building), but are different companies. Its not a good analogy since Pepsi owns both companies and that scenario is structured for cost savings and our is revenue share. But hopefully you all get the jist.

At least that is my understanding
icon url

JMoola

05/21/09 5:37 PM

#13516 RE: maskone #13502

The good thing is that any projects they work on together will be PR'd through CXAC (assuming they choose to use a PR for communications).

So, for example, a celebrity endorsement PR would hopefully bring eyes and MOMO to the PPS.