InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kb8zks

04/21/09 9:36 AM

#122274 RE: ah1969 #122271

I'm not going to settle for .10. I'd rather sit on it for the year and get something better.
icon url

drifterfcrc

04/21/09 9:36 AM

#122275 RE: ah1969 #122271

He will have lost ALL credibility with a PR like that.
icon url

jerad2

04/21/09 9:42 AM

#122279 RE: ah1969 #122271

Been waiting for a dip for 3 weeks, others can sell, I'm buying. GLTA
icon url

oneinamillion

04/21/09 9:47 AM

#122288 RE: ah1969 #122271

Not sure what MM's would gain at this point trying to dip her. Only a few parties would gain from that and I would have no problem letting those parties have a hard time once it becomes clear who they are. lol. Obviously, one would be the acquirer who is pressuring Jared to sell the stock at their price. Unlikely, a conglomerate would engage in that behavior unless they are using an outside investment house which we know these days have lost their reputations as playing fair. There are others but I won't name them for now. Either way this stock is going to rock and everyone knows it even our board critics,lol.
icon url

dgca

04/21/09 9:53 AM

#122294 RE: ah1969 #122271

While I normally do not get involved in most of the silly banter of the board, especially as of late, on this I will make an exception.

People are basing their decisions and comments on their goals. That is rather presumptous to think Jared's are the same. Jared has gone out and built up a company that he wanted. Who are you, or any of us for that matter, to say, "No, you need to sell your company because I want to make X times on my investment, and I want it today."

Jared has created Esso as he wanted it. We, as investors, in turn can invest in his company, his dream if you will, or sell out of it as we want.

If Jared thinks he is being low balled on offers, why should he accept? Just to make some quick kill investors happy? I think not.

Dave
icon url

oneinamillion

04/21/09 10:02 AM

#122305 RE: ah1969 #122271

"He'd better have some good news to justify staying independent" Agreed and he probably has some real good news to turn down the first offer. I have experience in a 60 year independent business there are alot of good points to having one. But it takes a ton of work and I can imagine the bigger you get the crap involved is tough. I know EESO would like to become a royalty giant(no big infrastructure needed) but there are challenges out there that are tough even for that business I am sure. I would be surprised based on everything EESO presents contract wise if the acquirer does not make an attractive offer. Who doesn't have a dream to sell to a Microsoft or IBM or GOOGLE or DOW or WMI or Clorax just to name a few.