InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mkrsmark77

04/21/09 9:57 AM

#122297 RE: dgca #122294

Well said...eom
icon url

jbtrk

04/21/09 9:59 AM

#122299 RE: dgca #122294

Finally, a voice of reason and common sense. I was beggining to wonder if it still exsisted...

Go EESO...!!...
icon url

PTiHubber

04/21/09 10:04 AM

#122307 RE: dgca #122294

Amen, Dave. Jared's primary goal is to build this company and then share the rewards with the shareholders.

So let him build the company, for crying out loud.

I've met the team and seen the product first-hand, so I don't doubt EESO as some do here. I recommend they make the trip to Ft. Wayne. If you really care, you'll make it happen. If you don't, I guess it's just your excuse to cast doubt on the company. Have fun. Those who made the trip aren't buying the bashing.
icon url

ah1969

04/21/09 10:06 AM

#122309 RE: dgca #122294

look i am saying he controls what mark says in any pr. Mark should not drop hints, (ex: franchise clarification). He knows people will bite on every word. If he wants his company to be perceived as something other than a pink then they should act like it and not release any info about what is coming and what is not coming, and just release when it is ready. I would call that manipulation. Why not shut people up and un gag the TA. He said in his conference call nothing can be gained. Well then nothing can be lost if he does it. The a/s are at 2 billion so it does not matter. I don't buy the incompetence. If that is what the shareholders want, put it to rest. If they want a copy of a verified contract put it out and put it to rest. He has to remember he is a PINK stock. Until he can get uplisted he should go above and beyond. He is only hurting the so called "Long Shareholders" that he says he cares about. Well then take care of them the way they stood by you in the beginning. Any replys as to "go sell your stock if your not happy" are not needed.