Replies to post #269972 on CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

[nufced]

uber, maybe it does and maybe it doesn't. Had Tyler not stepped in, where would the co and the cert be today?

2005__Long before TylerThere are 16 claims blocks remaining in the Smeaton property and presently the Company is involved in litigation with the vendor as it is the opinion of the Company that CMKM Diamonds Inc. and 101047025 Saskatchewan are in breach of the October 20, 2005 Mineral Option Agreements. These matters are still before the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

[pantherj]

I think like you, uber. it was originally intended to be a wind up distribution to the shareholders with Urbie agreeing to forego his share. (or something like that) To my recollection, it was never intended for the "company," nor do i see that anyone has the right to give it to anyone but the shareholders. On the other hand, who's going to sue for their part of 12 cents/million shares. But, creditors might sue for part of the 85K.

i could go on about this for a long time. but, it all falls in line with what I've said since day one; that shareholders would never see a penny from the entourage shares and that Frizzy/West would usurp it for themselves.


I still say the Entourage clown should have kept his mouth shut.