InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pHiLtHy

02/27/09 1:35 AM

#246 RE: SyndicateTwo #245

..."I don't understand why they can't do what's worked EVERY TIME it's been done. CUT TAXES DRAMATICALLY and then let the public do what they do best with THEIR money - BUY STUFF WITH IT!..."

yes, a holiday on tax would be the quick fix infusion of cash into the economy... makes a lot of sense right?

here's the reason they WON'T do it...

it would expose how much the government takes from us... they can't afford to have that happen... instead they do the only thing they know how to do... create a crisis, fear, and then take our money and piss it away.

we are witnessing an all out assault on capitalism.

wanna know where we're headed? the economic and social model for the rest of the country will be that of California and Michigan at this rate.
icon url

MRVLReader

02/27/09 2:03 AM

#247 RE: SyndicateTwo #245

icon url

sungolfer

02/27/09 7:10 AM

#249 RE: SyndicateTwo #245

S2 Obama has stated we are in trouble because of past policy's,so they are going to do it their way,come hell or high water.You think his visit to Canada was for tea.As a ex,Canadian Obama looks like he wants to follow them.Social medicine,high taxes(i was at 55%)no tax deduction on home morgages.
icon url

MRVLReader

02/27/09 1:46 PM

#254 RE: SyndicateTwo #245

S2:
Is this report below that you was talking about?
Thanks!

http://investopedia.com/printable.asp?a=/articles/technical/04/042804.asp
icon url

YoungQuixote

03/02/09 1:48 AM

#258 RE: SyndicateTwo #245

The free market isn’t as efficient as all the brainiacs would like to think. Read on to learn more.

The effectiveness of cutting taxes to spur the economy is inarguable; it flat out works. There’s no doubt, in my lay opinion, that the fastest way to reestablish growth is through supply side economics; incentivize people to provide goods and services that are in demand. The only problem with that it doesn’t have any effect on what is in demand and that’s where things get uncomfortable in the good ole US of A.

The Achilles heel of the mythical free market is that while it is efficient at finding a solution, it is slow at defining/identifying the problem and it has no restraint. I call it mythical because the only true free market that exists is the black market and even the most hardcore yet still sane capitalist would agree that markets do need to be fettered to a certain extent. Anyway back to the heel, the free market only acts in two ways: either someone stumbles across a paradigm shift (Karl Benz invents the modern automobile; Henry Ford makes it affordable) or there is a monumental crisis (can’t think of an example perhaps because the free market has never solved a crisis).

I’ll look past the financial crisis in this discussion (caused by the free markets lack of restraint) and talk about energy in general and the automobile specifically. Energy has been a problem longer than I’ve been alive; first as a political problem (1973 oil embargo), then also an economic problem (1979 energy crisis), and now finally acknowledged as an environmental problem. The first two legs of the energy issue are less controversial but even if you don’t think climate change is anthropogenic, you must admit that its better to not dump pollution into the atmosphere. More than 1/3 of a century has passed since the energy problem was first posed and what has Pegasus given us on it own? Nothing.

In contrast we can see tangible effect on how regulatory requirements can define specific problems for the free market to solve as well as how the free market behaves when there is no regulatory demand for improvement. CAFÉ standards were first enacted in 1975 and the requirement grew from 18 mpg starting in 1978 to 27.5 mpg in 1985 and has basically stayed flat since then. The free market responded to CAFÉ by improving the fuel efficiency of automobiles by 46% in a 7 year period (18.8 - 28.8 mpg from 1978 -1985). When there was no economic incentive or regulatory requirement the market did nothing as one would expect (1985 - 2001). When there was only economic incentive the market drove a 5% improvement in performance versus a 66% increase in the price of gasoline (28.8 - 30.3 mpg from 2001 - 2006).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Average_Fuel_Economy

The point of all that is that the free market lacks the vision necessary to solve the problems that the United States faces today. And that’s only on energy policy.