It really doesn't matter what 'appears' to make sense.
If DNAPrint knew, from the start, that Dutchess would obtain the funds in that way, it would have made much more sense for DNAPrint to just sell their own shares on the open market,
Read the filings. I don't make this stuff up.
DNAG specifically explains that Dutchess will be shorting shares whenever DNAG requests funds.
DNAPrint would have ignored Dutchess altogether, and gone straight to the shareholders. Why would they do otherwise, unless Dutchess deceived/betrayed them?)
It wasn't DNAG that was deceived/betrayed, it was the shareholders.
LOOK IT UP!!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
