Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:59:54 PM
If DNAPrint knew, from the start, that Dutchess would obtain the funds in that way, it would have made much more sense for DNAPrint to just sell their own shares on the open market,
Read the filings. I don't make this stuff up.
DNAG specifically explains that Dutchess will be shorting shares whenever DNAG requests funds.
DNAPrint would have ignored Dutchess altogether, and gone straight to the shareholders. Why would they do otherwise, unless Dutchess deceived/betrayed them?)
It wasn't DNAG that was deceived/betrayed, it was the shareholders.
LOOK IT UP!!!
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • DBGI • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM