Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:59:54 PM
If DNAPrint knew, from the start, that Dutchess would obtain the funds in that way, it would have made much more sense for DNAPrint to just sell their own shares on the open market,
Read the filings. I don't make this stuff up.
DNAG specifically explains that Dutchess will be shorting shares whenever DNAG requests funds.
DNAPrint would have ignored Dutchess altogether, and gone straight to the shareholders. Why would they do otherwise, unless Dutchess deceived/betrayed them?)
It wasn't DNAG that was deceived/betrayed, it was the shareholders.
LOOK IT UP!!!
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM