![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:59:54 PM
If DNAPrint knew, from the start, that Dutchess would obtain the funds in that way, it would have made much more sense for DNAPrint to just sell their own shares on the open market,
Read the filings. I don't make this stuff up.
DNAG specifically explains that Dutchess will be shorting shares whenever DNAG requests funds.
DNAPrint would have ignored Dutchess altogether, and gone straight to the shareholders. Why would they do otherwise, unless Dutchess deceived/betrayed them?)
It wasn't DNAG that was deceived/betrayed, it was the shareholders.
LOOK IT UP!!!
FEATURED POET and Luxshare Tech Expand Product Offerings for Artificial Intelligence Networks • Aug 1, 2024 9:28 AM
Management Discusses Financial Filings of Global Arena Holding Inc., for 10-K 2023 and 10-Q, 1st Quarter 2024 • GAHC • Aug 1, 2024 9:14 AM
VAYK Announces LOI to Acquire $1 Million Home Service Company to Support Airbnb Business • VAYK • Aug 1, 2024 9:00 AM
Duane Forrester Joins INDEXR as SVP of Search • MONI • Jul 31, 2024 11:46 AM
Lingerie Fighting Championships Help Fulfill Death-Bed Promise With First Major Motion Picture • BOTY • Jul 31, 2024 9:00 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Significantly Reduces Debt from Multiple Holders • KGKG • Jul 31, 2024 9:00 AM