Replies to post #81200 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Fine. Feel free.

I emphatically disagree. I have seen no evidence, among the many thousands of posts from "detractors," that Tony Frudakis and Hector Gomez are "vultures," in any sense.

Just keep your eyes open and don't let anyone get their hand in your pocket based on some warm and fuzzy 'trust' that may have been instilled in you. Proceed with caution. Remember, it's your money.

[Porgie Tirebiter]

Dan:

Frog's right -- you don't like it, but he's right.

The Board seat and even the Chairmanship are yours for the taking. Go do it. The entire management team has left. Dutchess isn't going to just sit around. If there is a dime in DNAG, these guys aren't going to leave it lay there.

So far as the value of the "intellectual property" goes, I would have it evaluated by two outside independent experts. College professors love to do this kind of stuff, and may even help you out gratis. One guy who knows about Genetics, and one guy who knows Patent Law. And I would do this before giving the company a cent.

And so far as just giving Gomez and Frudakis more money and letting them run the company with it... Well, think about this: How would that differentiate you from previous investors who have seen their money evaporate?

Good luck. I mean it.