InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 721
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/17/2007

Re: frogdreaming post# 81199

Tuesday, 02/10/2009 2:04:36 PM

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 2:04:36 PM

Post# of 82595
"frogdreaming,"

I emphatically disagree. I have seen no evidence, among the many thousands of posts from "detractors," that Tony Frudakis and Hector Gomez are "vultures," in any sense. The only claims that even come close to insinuating that, have (by implication) seemed to expect them to have worked for free, all along, or for minimum wage. Such expectations are not appropriate, or realistic, for men with such talents and backgrounds.

The status quo is not something I'm interested in. I'm interested in getting DNAPrint Genomics up and running again, and certain goals are in mind, (such as, in the near term, avoiding a fire sale, and avoiding any "toxic" financing, eliminating the Dutchess debt as quickly as possible, possibly buying Dutchess' stake in the company, and of course, capitalizing on the company's strengths, including tapping into the full potential of its talents and intellectual property.) Richard Gabriel, who also resigned, has been widely criticized. I'm open to comments and suggestions, but as I see it, perhaps a different CEO would be more appropriate, moving forward. (I'm not looking to be the CEO.)

Another thing that needs to change, about the status quo, is that the SEC needs to do its job, and stop allowing microcap companies to be driven down into the ground by unethical short sellers and "vultures." Securities manipulation, whether direct or indirect (such as through propaganda,) is something we've seen directed against DNAG very constantly, for years. That needs to stop. I suggest everyone contact the SEC, to complain, whenever they see such activities in connection with DNAG, or any security, for that matter.

SEC Complaint Center
http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

The whole scandal with the Madoff whistleblower, and the SEC not listening to his very credible evidence for 10 years, may provide the opening needed, for force _real_ reform at the SEC. But we, the public, need to be very forceful about it, in order to have any chance of success. A sleeping watchdog? The SEC is more like a dead watchdog.

Daniel