InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jaybird249

01/26/09 9:39 PM

#3791 RE: Rawnoc #3790

ooohh yoor blunt but effective!
icon url

KlausVT

01/26/09 10:17 PM

#3816 RE: Rawnoc #3790

Rawnoc -

them burning through cash at the same rate as last quarter is unrealistic as management has proven prudent in the past. Finished goods actually decreased by $20,000 to $765,000 which is presumably still due to a postponed (but not canceled as far as we know) order and the rest is raw materials of $1,564,000 to be used for upcoming production. If the orders would further slow down the cash flow could become virtually zero (relatively speaking) as fixed costs are low and if no or little production occurs only very little cash is needed (personnel, fixed facilities) as no new material needs to be acquired.

I'm not taking sides nor have I made up my mind whether to further invest or not (I only have a small position in this stock bought at $0.79 a little while ago with winnings during the big upturn, meaning "free" shares). I just don't share your POS point of view in your black-and-white fashion. There is always room for interpretation and that is true for any argument you and other people here on this board bring up for AYSI or VBDG.

Truth is, none of us have the full picture and therefore there is room for speculation and that's what most of the arguments are based on (even though they are based on historic data), nevertheless they are speculation and will remain so until they turn historic with the next quarterly report.